Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit

From: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, John Proctor <jproctor(at)prium(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit
Date: 2002-04-16 03:25:20
Message-ID: web-1371946@davinci.ethosmedia.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-sql

Bruce,

> The following patch adds --maxindfuncparams to configure to allow you
> to
> more easily set the maximum number of function parameters and columns
> in an index. (Can someone come up with a better name?)

How about simply --max_params ?

> Are we staying at 16 as the default? I personally think we can
> increase it to 32 with little penalty,

I'd vote for that. But then, you knew that. John Proctor wants 128.

>and that we should increase
> NAMEDATALEN to 64.

I don't even know that is.

-Josh

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manuel Sugawara 2002-04-16 03:32:30 Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2002-04-16 03:24:21 Re: [PATCHES] YADP - Yet another Dependency Patch

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2002-04-16 03:34:04 Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2002-04-16 03:24:21 Re: [PATCHES] YADP - Yet another Dependency Patch

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2002-04-16 03:34:04 Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2002-04-16 03:19:45 Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit