> It would depend in part on the size of the patch, and on whether
> are any arguments for supporting GSSAPI besides "Java can't do
> What would it buy for a libpq user?
According to the Solaris Security engineers, GSSAPI is more secure than
using the Kerberos headers. Also, in theory GSSAPI is supposed to
support multiple authentication back-ends (ldap, liberty, etc.), but I
personally have never seen support for anything but Kerberos.
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco 415-752-2500
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: David Wheeler||Date: 2006-09-28 22:07:39|
|Subject: Patch: Tie stats options to autovacuum in postgresql.conf|
|Previous:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2006-09-28 22:01:12|
|Subject: Re: JAVA Support|