Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: JAVA Support

From: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Henry B(dot) Hotz" <hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: JAVA Support
Date: 2006-09-28 22:03:32
Message-ID: web-10219356@davinci.ethosmedia.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom,

> It would depend in part on the size of the patch, and on whether
> there
> are any arguments for supporting GSSAPI besides "Java can't do
> Kerberos".
> What would it buy for a libpq user?

According to the Solaris Security engineers, GSSAPI is more secure than
using the Kerberos headers.  Also, in theory GSSAPI is supposed to
support multiple authentication back-ends (ldap, liberty, etc.), but I
personally have never seen support for anything but Kerberos.


Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco 415-752-2500

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David WheelerDate: 2006-09-28 22:07:39
Subject: Patch: Tie stats options to autovacuum in postgresql.conf
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2006-09-28 22:01:12
Subject: Re: JAVA Support

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group