Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Transaction system (proposal for 6.5)

From: Michael Graff <explorer(at)flame(dot)org>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robson Miranda <rmiranda(at)rudah(dot)com(dot)br>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Transaction system (proposal for 6.5)
Date: 1998-09-21 15:55:03
Message-ID: v6r9x5zciw.fsf@kechara.lh.vix.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:

> 	Not sure, but IMHO, having a redo log capability would be a HUGE
> win also...consider a mission critical application that doesn't have, in
> essence, "live backups" in the form of a redo log...

Considering that every postgresql application I write has two backups:

	o a full database dump,
	o an incremental change log,

so I can do exactly that...

--Michael

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: J. Michael RobertsDate: 1998-09-21 16:18:47
Subject: Re: [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend]
Previous:From: Thomas G. LockhartDate: 1998-09-21 15:45:48
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Errors inside transactions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group