Re: Visibility regression test

From: Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Visibility regression test
Date: 2002-08-29 15:06:58
Message-ID: v6dsmu4p0spiue3ar92rt3t922vbvr2dal@4ax.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:30:59 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
wrote:
>Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at> writes:
>> A new regression test trying to detect runaway INSERTs/UPDATEs.
>
>Why?

Because we do not want to run a database that gets hung in an endless
loop on INSERT or UPDATE. Better we find such bugs during regression
testing.

>Seems like a waste of test cycles to me.

I'd agree, if the test was not able to detect the error condition it
was written for. But I did a test with a buggy postmaster and the bug
was detected.

Servus
Manfred

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-08-29 15:24:59 Re: Proposed patch for qual pushdown into UNION/INTERSECT
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2002-08-29 14:58:30 Re: Proposed patch for qual pushdown into UNION/INTERSECT