| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: bugs that have not been replied-to on list |
| Date: | 2010-04-29 00:33:22 |
| Message-ID: | v2q603c8f071004281733v2c419e2fhbc1696434188b1a5@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
<dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> writes:
>> As in have a (hyptothetical) tracker being subscribed to -bugs (and maybe
>> the other lists in the future as well) so the workflow would look like
>> this:
>
> Well there is a WIP to use an ArchiveOpteryX based solution to replace
> the archives and get rid of the artificial breaking of pages. My guess
> is that adding a status table linking to emails and that a set of
> volunteers (they gave their names!) maintain would make our day.
It would be great to leverage that. Is there any chance of that
getting finalized and deployed to production some time in the
forseeable future?
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | sibal | 2010-04-29 08:33:58 | BUG #5441: Why Not????? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-04-28 21:20:17 | Re: BUG #5417: intarray adds <@ operator which breaks infromation_schema.referential_constraints |