Re: Schema unique stamp (OID, MD5?)

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: Schema unique stamp (OID, MD5?)
Date: 2002-02-24 08:52:20
Message-ID: twXWGtZbz5b3.CZKyH3D3@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Sorry, I don't understand what you are asking.

/D

_____________Original message ____________
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Schema unique stamp (OID, MD5?)
Sender: Jean-Michel POURE <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 08:49:07 +0000

Le Samedi 23 Février 2002 21:53, Dave Page a écrit :
> This would be very expensive, even on moderately sized databases wouldn't
> it? Why not just check the ctid of the relevant tuple to see if it has
> changed since it was last read.

What if you create a trigger on a function which does not exist anymore. Is
there a way to query a unique OID?

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Michel POURE 2002-02-24 15:04:45 Escaping quotes and double-quotes problem
Previous Message Jean-Michel POURE 2002-02-24 08:46:59 Working oin pgAdmin2