Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP

From: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP
Date: 2005-09-29 07:48:25
Message-ID: thhal-0zDQXBHGg8bQNVcbXFW17HaXM1wiybh@mailblocks.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Nope, no anti-virus and no firewall (other then the box that fronts my 
home-network to the outside world).

- thomas

Magnus Hagander wrote:

>>Hi,
>>I've installed PostgreSQL 8.1-beta2 as a service on my 
>>Windows-XP box. 
>>It runs fine but I get repeated messages like this in the log:
>>
>>   2005-09-29 00:41:09 FATAL:  could not duplicate socket 
>>1880 for use in backend: error code 10038
>>
>>and for each message printed, a new postgres process is 
>>created. To make things worse, those processes do not die 
>>when I stop the service.
>>
>>I use sysinternals tcpview to monitor my sockets. I know that 
>>no other process is using 1880. Each started postgres process 
>>will occupy two, seemingly random ports that apparently form 
>>a loop somehow. This is a typical entry:
>>
>>   <non-existent>:3136	TCP	127.0.0.1:1554	
>>127.0.0.1:1555 ESTABLISHED	
>>   <non-existent>:3136	TCP	127.0.0.1:1555	
>>127.0.0.1:1554	ESTABLISHED	
>>
>>The weird thing is that there is no process with pid 3136 
>>(hence the name <non-existent>). There is a postgres process 
>>with another pid in my process listing. If I kill that, the 
>><non-existstent> entries go away.
>>
>>Looks like pid 3136 is talking to itself. A pipe() followed 
>>by failure to start the new process perhaps?
>>    
>>
>
>
>Do you by any chance run any antivirus or firewall software? If so, can
>you try removing it (note! actual uninstall, not just disabling it!)
>
>//Magnus
>  
>



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2005-09-29 07:58:13
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2005-09-29 07:07:59
Subject: Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group