Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Upgrading rant.

From: Thomas O'Connell <tfo(at)monsterlabs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Upgrading rant.
Date: 2003-01-06 18:56:04
Message-ID: tfo-545BB1.12560406012003@news.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Exactly. I've got something that works and is, in fact, the recommended 
method for upgrading, currently.

For me to switch, I'd need something in which the developers were 
confident enough to recommend.

And even to test, I'd need something more than what is available right 
now.

-tfo

In article <200301061836(dot)h06Ia4m27264(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,
 pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian) wrote:

> I think you are on to something here.  Clearly dump/reload works, and
> testing pg_upgrade is time-consuming, so people aren't as inclined to
> jump into testing.  It isn't quite like testing a bugfix or new feature.

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Dan LangilleDate: 2003-01-06 19:00:21
Subject: Re: New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2003-01-06 18:51:11
Subject: Re: New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group