On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Here's the fine patch. The actual code changes are simple and seem to
>> work as expected, but I struggled a bit with the phrasing of the
>> messages. Feel free to suggest improvements.
> Stick with the original wording? I don't really see a need to change it.
I don't think that's a good idea. If we just say that the remaining
connection slots are for superusers, someone will inevitably ask us
why their superuser replication can't connect. I think it's important
to phrase things as accurately as possible.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-04-22 15:10:34|
|Subject: Re: Thread safety and libxml2|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2010-04-22 09:31:58|
|Subject: Re: Hot Standby b-tree delete records review|