On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 14:37:27 -0400, you wrote:
>a patch [...] that fixes the ability to "serialize" a simple java class
>into a postgres table.
>The current cvs seems completely broken in this support, so the patch
>puts it into working condition, granted that there are many limitations
>with serializing java classes into Postgres.
I would appreciate it if you would explain to us a little more
what does and doesn't work before and after applying this patch.
[jdbc-list added to the CC]
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Vsevolod Lobko||Date: 2001-08-23 22:04:21|
|Subject: Re: Patch for pl/tcl Tcl_ExternalToUtf and Tcl_UtfToExternal
|Previous:||From: Magnus Naeslund(f)||Date: 2001-08-23 21:22:14|
|Subject: [PATCH] Win32 errno a little bit safer|
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2001-08-23 21:56:51|
|Subject: Re: Re: [JDBC] New backend functions? [was Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions...] |
|Previous:||From: Johann Zuschlag||Date: 2001-08-23 21:31:05|
|Subject: Re: Re: Comparing fixed precision to floating (no anwer)|