On 2007-03-02, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I think these are actual bugs. If you happened to provide a large enough datum
> to the gist code it would cause the same problem I'm seeing. The packed
> varlena patch just makes it easier to trigger.
Are you taking into account the fact that, at least prior to your patch,
values in index tuples could never be toasted?
http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruno Wolff III||Date: 2007-03-02 18:47:21|
|Subject: Re: Expanding DELETE/UPDATE returning|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2007-03-02 18:39:22|
|Subject: Re: UPSERT|