Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: constraints and sql92 information_schema compliance

From: Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews(at)supernews(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: constraints and sql92 information_schema compliance
Date: 2006-02-27 19:05:39
Message-ID: slrne06jc3.5md.andrew+nonews@atlantis.supernews.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2006-02-27, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I do have doubts about adding any large number of add-on views to
> pg_catalog, because of the privileged place of that schema in search
> paths.  It'd be better to put them in a separate schema ("pg_info"
> maybe?) where they'd pose less risk of conflicts with user-defined names.
> Does newsysviews already do this?

The current version in pgfoundry CVS uses "pg_sysviews" as the schema name.
If you have any better suggestions for the name, or any other aspect of the
project, then we're all ears.

-- 
Andrew, Supernews
http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2006-02-27 19:07:17
Subject: Re: constraints and sql92 information_schema compliance
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-02-27 18:52:59
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] display and expression of the home directory in Win32

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group