From: | Conny Thimren <conny(dot)thimren(at)servit(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | general peformance question |
Date: | 2003-12-18 17:04:52 |
Message-ID: | servi008_3fe1db5e7a4d6@webmail.servit.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi,
This a kind of newbie-question. I've been using Postgres for a long time in a low transction environment - and it is great.
Now I've got an inquiry for using Postgresql in a heavy-load on-line system. This system must handle something like 20 questions per sec with a response time at 1/10 sec. Each question will result in approx 5-6 reads and a couple of updates.
Anybody have a feeling if this is realistic on a Intelbased Linux server with Postgresql. Ofcourse I know that this is too little info for an exact answer but - as I said - maybe someone can give a hint if it's possible. Maybe someone with heavy-load can give an example of what is possible...
Regards
Conny Thimrén
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marinos J. Yannikos | 2003-12-18 18:44:49 | why do optimizer parameters have to be set manually? |
Previous Message | Dennis Bjorklund | 2003-12-18 15:12:16 | Re: Why is restored database faster? |