Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: master in standby mode croaks

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: master in standby mode croaks
Date: 2010-04-17 22:52:35
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 17:44 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> > I will change the error message.
>> I gave a good deal of thought to trying to figure out a cleaner
>> solution to this problem than just changing the error message and
>> failed.  So let's change the error message.  Of course I'm not quite
>> sure what we should change it TO, given that the situation is the
>> result of an interaction between three different GUCs and we have no
>> way to distinguish which one(s) are the problem.
> "You need all three" covers it.

Actually you need standby_connections and either archive_mode=on or
max_wal_senders>0, I think.


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-04-18 03:23:28
Subject: enable_material patch
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-04-17 22:52:26
Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group