On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 17:44 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> > I will change the error message.
>> I gave a good deal of thought to trying to figure out a cleaner
>> solution to this problem than just changing the error message and
>> failed. So let's change the error message. Of course I'm not quite
>> sure what we should change it TO, given that the situation is the
>> result of an interaction between three different GUCs and we have no
>> way to distinguish which one(s) are the problem.
> "You need all three" covers it.
Actually you need standby_connections and either archive_mode=on or
max_wal_senders>0, I think.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-04-18 03:23:28|
|Subject: enable_material patch|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-04-17 22:52:26|
|Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |