| From: | "Bob Powell" <Bob(at)hotchkiss(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Postgress and MYSQL |
| Date: | 2004-01-13 16:32:22 |
| Message-ID: | s003d760.005@grpwise.hotchkiss.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
To whom it may concern:
I find the recent articles in various trade publications a little
disturbing due to the lack of PostgrSQL mention. I continue to see
articles about how IBM may be considering MYSQL for development an
open_source web database.
Why isn't PostgreSQL being considered or talked about by major industry
giants? As a DBA I know that Postgres is far superior to MYSQL but if
the industry directs it's energies towards open-source database this
coming year I think somehow PostgreSQL needs to be represented better.
Bob Powell
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2004-01-13 16:32:46 | Re: attempt on website changes |
| Previous Message | Keith C. Perry | 2004-01-13 16:29:08 | Re: attempt on website changes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-01-13 16:34:12 | Re: Probably a security bug in PostgreSQL rule system |
| Previous Message | John Sidney-Woollett | 2004-01-13 16:25:45 | Re: Best practice? Web application: single PostgreSQL |