Why JDBC 1?

From: Rene Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Why JDBC 1?
Date: 2001-09-04 16:50:00
Message-ID: re1aptosh3nro4df4h9qgbj49g27oq20fl@4ax.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Perhaps this is a silly question, but why do we have separate
JDBC 1 and 2 drivers?

Isn't the JDBC 2 driver also an implementation of JDBC 1?

Regards,
René Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl>

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rene Pijlman 2001-09-04 17:03:41 Re: [JDBC] Troubles using German Umlauts with JDBC
Previous Message Barry Lind 2001-09-04 16:48:32 Re: JAVA vs PERL : PERL wins to postgreSQL