>> I can see that very long transaction are not supported.
Where or how did you see that?
>As far as transaction is concerned, my question was if there is any limit
>to the number of statements (select/insert/update) that can be
>in one single transaction.
>Is is possible postgresql buffer size influence transaction
>I had a transaction with thousands of statements that I neeeded
>to split it into a number smaller transaction in order to be able to
What does that mean exactly? What went wrong with the original
Was it an executeBatch() with a lot of statements, or a lot of
individual statements? What version of the PostgreSQL driver and
backend are you running?
>Let's say that I have a field in a table having tha type VARCHAR(100)
>And I store to this field a value having 200 characters. Only the
>first 100 characters of the value will be stored.
>I think that in this case according to JDBC, a Data Truncation warning
>should be reported.
Our driver does not yet support DataTruncation warnings. That's
documented on http://lab.applinet.nl/postgresql-jdbc/
René Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl>
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Thomas O'Dowd||Date: 2001-09-14 10:09:16|
|Subject: Re: Patch to add bytea support to JDBC|
|Previous:||From: Rene Pijlman||Date: 2001-09-14 09:47:47|
|Subject: Re: Fw: JDBC Bug Report|