Re: SQL conformance related patch

From: Troels Arvin <troels(at)arvin(dot)dk>
To: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SQL conformance related patch
Date: 2004-11-25 21:28:56
Message-ID: pan.2004.11.25.21.28.55.956811@arvin.dk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-patches

On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 22:13:01 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> I could buy "SQL:1999", because then "SQL" would be a macro expanding to
> "ISO/IEC 9075". But I don't see how SQL-92 fits in there.

There was a naming change between SQL-92 and SQL:1999, according to the
mentioned book.
The ":" is because the standard's name has been brought in line with
ISO's naming standards. The expansion to four digits was because of the
general year-2000 trend.

>> Note 1:
>> http://books.elsevier.com/mk/default.asp?isbn=1558604561 has a
>> section on this subject.
>
> Note that this book is titled "SQL 1999 - Understanding Relational
> Language Components". Apparently, they are not sure either.

Yes, that's ironic. But I have the book right here. There is clearly a ":"
in the name on the front page, as well as in the colophon.

--
Greetings from Troels Arvin, Copenhagen, Denmark

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2004-11-26 19:52:28 Re: [PATCHES] SQL conformance related patch
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-11-25 21:13:01 Re: SQL conformance related patch

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-11-26 01:34:33 Improvement to pg_trgm readme
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-11-25 21:13:01 Re: SQL conformance related patch