On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:47:54 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> So memcached becomes a very good place to stick data that's read often but not
> updated often, or alternately data that changes often but is disposable. An
> example of the former is a user+ACL list; and example of the latter is web
> session information ... or simple materialized views.
Has anyone tried at least two of
2. Tugela Cache (pretty much the same as memcached, I think)
In that case: Do you have any comparative remarks?
Greetings from Troels Arvin, Copenhagen, Denmark
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Greg Stark||Date: 2004-11-17 08:08:20|
|Subject: Re: memcached and PostgreSQL|
|Previous:||From: Joshua D. Drake||Date: 2004-11-17 06:40:07|
|Subject: Re: query plan question|