Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: memcached and PostgreSQL

From: Troels Arvin <troels(at)arvin(dot)dk>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: memcached and PostgreSQL
Date: 2004-11-17 07:48:33
Message-ID: pan.2004.11.17.07.48.31.163515@arvin.dk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:47:54 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:

> So memcached becomes a very good place to stick data that's read often but not 
> updated often, or alternately data that changes often but is disposable.   An 
> example of the former is a user+ACL list; and example of the latter is web 
> session information ... or simple materialized views.

Has anyone tried at least two of

1. memcached
2. Tugela Cache (pretty much the same as memcached, I think)
3. Sharedance

In that case: Do you have any comparative remarks?


Links:

1: http://www.danga.com/memcached/

2: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tugela_Cache
   http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/wikipedia/tugelacache/

3: http://sharedance.pureftpd.org/

-- 
Greetings from Troels Arvin, Copenhagen, Denmark



In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Greg StarkDate: 2004-11-17 08:08:20
Subject: Re: memcached and PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2004-11-17 06:40:07
Subject: Re: query plan question

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group