Re: SELECT INTO large FKyed table is slow

From: "Pierre C" <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com>
To: "Mario Splivalo" <mario(dot)splivalo(at)megafon(dot)hr>
Cc: mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SELECT INTO large FKyed table is slow
Date: 2010-12-01 08:43:07
Message-ID: op.vm0055s0eorkce@apollo13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


> So, I did. I run the whole script in psql, and here is the result for
> the INSERT:
>
> realm_51=# explain analyze INSERT INTO drones_history (2771, drone_id,
> drone_log_notice, drone_temperature, drone_pressure) SELECT * FROM
> tmp_drones_history;
> QUERY PLAN
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Seq Scan on tmp_drones_history (cost=0.00..81.60 rows=4160 width=48)
> (actual time=0.008..5.296 rows=5150 loops=1)
> Trigger for constraint drones_history_fk__drones: time=92.948
> calls=5150
> Total runtime: 16779.644 ms
> (3 rows)
>
>
> Now, this is only 16 seconds. In this 'batch' I've inserted 5150 rows.
> The batch before, I run that one 'the usual way', it inserted 9922 rows,
> and it took 1 minute and 16 seconds.
>
> I did not, however, enclose the process into begin/end.
>
> So, here are results when I, in psql, first issued BEGIN:
>
> realm_51=# explain analyze INSERT INTO drones_history (2772, drone_id,
> drone_log_notice, drone_temperature, drone_pressure) SELECT * FROM
> tmp_drones_history;
> QUERY PLAN
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Seq Scan on tmp_drones_history (cost=0.00..79.56 rows=4056 width=48)
> (actual time=0.008..6.490 rows=5059 loops=1)
> Trigger for constraint drones_history_fk__drones: time=120.224
> calls=5059
> Total runtime: 39658.250 ms
> (3 rows)
>
> Time: 39658.906 ms
>
>
>
> Mario
>

Note that in both cases postgres reports that the FK checks take 92-120
milliseconds... which is a normal time for about 4000 rows.
Inserting 4000 lines with just a few fields like you got should take quite
much less than 1 s...

Where the rest of the time goes, I have no idea. Disk thrashing ? Locks ?
Gremlins ?

- try it on a fresh copy of all your tables (CREATE TABLE, INSERT INTO
SELECT)
- try to put the WAL on a separate physical disk (or do a check with
fsync=off)
- try it on another computer
- try it on another harddisk
- run oprofile on a debug compile of postgres
- it could even be the process title updates (I don't think so but...)
- try a ramdisk tablespace

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message pasman pasmański 2010-12-01 11:38:21 Re: tidscan not work ? Pg 8.4.5 + WinXP
Previous Message Pierre C 2010-12-01 08:23:23 Re: SELECT INTO large FKyed table is slow