Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions

From: "Pierre C" <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com>
To: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Dave Crooke" <dcrooke(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, Corin <wakathane(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Andy Colson" <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>
Subject: Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions
Date: 2010-03-22 11:15:51
Message-ID: op.u9yuwpqveorkce@localhost (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:14:51 +0100, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>  
wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Dave Crooke <dcrooke(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Note however that Oracle offeres full transactionality and does in  
>> place row
>> updates. There is more than one way to do it.
>
> There's no free lunch.

MVCC : VACUUM
Oracle : Rollback Segments
MyISAM : no concurrency/transactions

It's all about which compromise suits you ;)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Matthew WakelingDate: 2010-03-22 11:48:44
Subject: Re: too complex query plan for not exists query and multicolumn indexes
Previous:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2010-03-22 11:14:51
Subject: Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group