Re: Postgres Benchmark Results

From: PFC <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com>
To: Chris <dmagick(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres Benchmark Results
Date: 2007-05-28 06:41:51
Message-ID: op.ts0x71w7cigqcu@apollo13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mon, 28 May 2007 05:53:16 +0200, Chris <dmagick(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
>> I am re-running it with other tuning, notably cost-based vacuum
>> delay and less frequent checkpoints, and it is a *lot* smoother.
>> These take a full night to run, so I'll post more results when I
>> have usefull stuff to show.
>> This has proven to be a very interesting trip to benchmarkland...
>
> [ rather late in my reply but I had to ]
>
> Are you tuning mysql in a similar fashion ?

Well, the tuning knobs are different, there are no check points or
vacuum... but yes I tried to tune MySQL too, but the hardest part was
simply making it work without deadlocking continuously.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2007-05-28 12:45:38 PITR performance costs
Previous Message Chris 2007-05-28 03:53:16 Re: Postgres Benchmark Results