Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs

From: PFC <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com>
To: "David Boreham" <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
Date: 2006-04-26 15:13:24
Message-ID: op.s8me8my1cigqcu@apollo13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


Have a look at this Wikipedia page which outlines some differences
between the AMD and Intel versions of 64-bit :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EM64T

> It isn't only Postgres. I work on a number of other server applications
> that also run much faster on Opterons than the published benchmark
> figures would suggest they should. They're all compiled with gcc4,
> so possibly there's a compiler issue. I don't run Windows on any
> of our Opteron boxes so I can't easily compare using the MS compiler.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2006-04-26 15:17:58 Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
Previous Message Ron Peacetree 2006-04-26 15:10:40 Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs