Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: btbulkdelete

From: Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: btbulkdelete
Date: 2004-04-28 09:16:52
Message-ID: oatu801kb21p9vftrj7jprs998qqo7l08h@email.aon.at (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 00:08:48 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Is there a special reason for scanning the leaf pages in *logical*
>> order, i.e. by following the opaque->btpo_next links?
>
>Yes.  [..] interlocking between indexscans and deletions.

Thanks for refreshing my memory.  This has been discussed two years ago,
and I even participated in that discussion :-(

Servus
 Manfred

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Fabien COELHODate: 2004-04-28 09:58:16
Subject: Re: bitwise and/or aggregate functions?
Previous:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 2004-04-28 08:31:57
Subject: Re: Bringing PostgreSQL torwards the standard regarding

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group