On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Anj Adu <fotographs(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I have a 16G box and tmpfs is configured to use 8G for tmpfs .
> Is a lot of memory being wasted that can be used for Postgres ? (I am
> not seeing any performance issues, but I am not clear how Linux uses
> the tmpfs and how Postgres would be affected by the reduction in
What does the output of "free -m" look like when the database is as
heavily used as it typically gets?
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Cédric Villemain||Date: 2010-04-28 07:49:05|
|Subject: Re: Optimization idea|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-04-28 00:55:11|
|Subject: Re: autovacuum strategy / parameters|