| From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | rod(at)iol(dot)ie |
| Cc: | "Gauthier, Dave" <dave(dot)gauthier(at)intel(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Native DB replication for PG |
| Date: | 2010-04-30 20:52:39 |
| Message-ID: | n2xdcc563d11004301352w581ea462ia3cf056312903423@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Raymond O'Donnell <rod(at)iol(dot)ie> wrote:
> On 30/04/2010 21:30, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Gauthier, Dave
>> <dave(dot)gauthier(at)intel(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I believe v9 will have native DB master/slave DB replication (correct if
>>> wrong). If so, what’s the best guess on when will v9 be released?
>>
>> If I had to plan server deployments for the next year (and I do) I'd
>> be sticking with pg 8.3 and a proven replication engine. Next summer
>
> Surely you mean 8.4? :-)
Nope. 8.3 and 8.4 have similar performance, and we don't really need
any of the newer features from 8.4 right yet. Also 8.4.1 was crashing
on us under heavy load and I haven't had time to investigate issue
yet.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mike Christensen | 2010-04-30 21:27:25 | Re: Indexing queries with bit masks |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-04-30 20:48:54 | Re: Inheritance efficiency |