Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Updated TODO item

From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kaare Rasmussen <kar(at)kakidata(dot)dk>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Updated TODO item
Date: 2002-01-04 18:58:09
Message-ID: m3sn9meyf2.fsf@varsoon.denali.to (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> > Shouldn't that be
> > 
> > CREATE DATABASE dbname WITH OWNER = "user"
> > 
> > ?
> 
> Yes!  OWNER is much better.  TODO updated and I will save this message
> for changes in 7.3:

Will this make OWNER into a new keyword, and break schemas that have
"owner" as a table or column name?  USER is at least already a
keyword...

-Doug (not personally affected, but thought I'd raise it)
-- 
Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees.
   --T. J. Jackson, 1863

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-01-04 19:04:00
Subject: Re: Updated TODO item
Previous:From: Jan WieckDate: 2002-01-04 18:56:51
Subject: Re: ON ERROR triggers

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-01-04 19:04:00
Subject: Re: Updated TODO item
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-01-04 18:43:41
Subject: Re: Updated TODO item

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group