"Andy Kriger" <akriger(at)greaterthanone(dot)com> writes:
> I have an inventory table. I need to be able to lock a row from being
> read/written while I: check the quantity value; modify it if necessary. From
> my experiments, it appears I can only do this with LOCK TABLE. Since this
> locks the whole table and not just the individual row, I'm guessing this
> would create quite a bottleneck if our application were larger. I'm also
> guessing that there's a better way to approach this probably common need.
Does SELECT ... FOR UPDATE not do what you want?
-Doug