Why all the programming languages?

Martha Stewart called it a Good Thing when paulsnewsgroups(at)hotmail(dot)com (Paul Ganainm) wrote:
> Maybe this is a silly question, but do you really need more than 10?
> What's the matter with one that does a great job?

Well, why do you imagine that there is more than one programming
language available on _any_ platform?

The answer is that different languages provide more convenient
notations for different purposes, or other useful properties.

PL/R, at one 'extreme,' provides access to a statistical language,
providing convenient notation for working with arrays to do "math
stuff."

PL/pgsql, on the other hand, provides, with a tiny burden of libraries
and such, provides looping and control structures with a "SQL-style"
notation very similar to Oracle's PL/SQL language.

PL/Perl allows embedding code that uses Perl's rich set of regular
expression syntax, which can sometimes be convenient.

PL/C isn't notationally very nice, requiring that you go through the
gory hoops of C memory management, but it allows exact control of what
is going on, and tight loops can be optimized to death by your C
compiler.

There's why you might want to have those four particular choices
around. C++, Ruby, Python, TCL, and Java all have fans, too, which is
why those languages exist in the first place.
--
select 'cbbrowne' || '@' || 'cbbrowne.com';
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/languages.html
Signs of a Klingon Programmer - 15. "Python? That is for children. A
Klingon Warrior uses only machine code, keyed in on the front panel
switches in raw binary."