Re: atomicity

From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com>
To: Hugo Coolens <hugo(dot)coolens(at)skynet(dot)be>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: atomicity
Date: 2002-02-26 18:36:02
Message-ID: m3664kxf8t.fsf@varsoon.denali.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hugo Coolens <hugo(dot)coolens(at)skynet(dot)be> writes:

> Is it true that the current version of PostgreSQL does always respect
> atomicity of transactions and MySQL does not?

The former is true; the latter I don't know about (MySQL has recently
added "transactions" but I don't know any details about how they
actually work).

-Doug
--
Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees.
--T. J. Jackson, 1863

In response to

  • atomicity at 2002-02-25 22:31:01 from Hugo Coolens

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Doug McNaught 2002-02-26 18:38:20 Re: pg_dump gives segmentation fault and cores
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2002-02-26 18:28:04 Re: archives.postgresql.org