From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Front End Languages for PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2005-02-16 23:02:55 |
Message-ID: | m34qgcnm5c.fsf@knuth.knuth.cbbrowne.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when lvaningen(at)ESNCC(dot)com ("Van Ingen, Lane") would write:
> Does anybody have any solid information that says that one language
> is better as a front end to a PostgreSQL database over another, and
> why ?
Here lies Serious Flamage...
One of the strengths of PostgreSQL is that people have built mappings
to make it usable in conjunction with _numerous_ languages, often with
APIs specially suited to the language.
People have had good success using numerous languages; it would seem
very strange to me for any language to be provably "better" in this
fashion.
--
(reverse (concatenate 'string "moc.liamg" "@" "enworbbc"))
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/languages.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #28. "My pet monster will be kept in a
secure cage from which it cannot escape and into which I could not
accidentally stumble." <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dick Davies | 2005-02-16 23:13:31 | Re: Front End Languages for PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-16 20:08:48 | Re: find close (duplicate) points + create index |