David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> I'm all in favor of having associative arrays as a 1st-class data type
> in PostgreSQL. How much harder would it be to make these generally
> available vs. tied to one particular language?
We already have them--they're called "tables with primary keys". :)
What's the use-case for these things? Just imitating Oracle?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-06-29 17:40:20|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles |
|Previous:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2005-06-29 17:18:27|
|Subject: Re: Proposal: associative arrays for plpgsql (concept)|