Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Streaming Replication on win32

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming Replication on win32
Date: 2010-01-22 09:00:50
Message-ID: m2y6jqqzst.fsf@hi-media.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:

> Joe Conway wrote:
>> OK, so now I see why we want this fixed for dblink and walreceiver, but
>> doesn't this approach leave every other WIN32 libpq client out in the
>> cold? Is there nothing that can be done for the general case, or is it a
>> SMOP?
>
> The problem only applies to libpq calls from the backend. Client apps
> are not affected, only backend modules. If there's any other modules out
> there that use libpq, then yes, those have a problem too.

plproxy comes to mind.

-- 
dim

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Marko KreenDate: 2010-01-22 10:28:29
Subject: Re: Streaming Replication on win32
Previous:From: Huda Booley (huda@careerjunction.co.za)Date: 2010-01-22 08:42:33
Subject: Standby server lagging behind

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group