| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Joseph Adams <joeyadams3(dot)14159(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Another swing at JSON |
| Date: | 2011-03-30 18:05:36 |
| Message-ID: | m2wrjg8owf.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I don't have any objection to putting some comments in the contrib Makefiles
> telling people to use PGXS, but I don't think that at this stage of the
> cycle we can start work on something that so far is just an idea from the
> top of my head.
I might be mistaken on how much work is hidden there, ok, you have the
point. I will try to clarify this in the doc patch I intend to submit
soon'ish: we still accept those while getting to beta, right?
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Urbański | 2011-03-30 18:21:05 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix plpgsql to release SPI plans when a function or DO block is |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-03-30 17:41:31 | pg_upgrade and PGCLIENTENCODING |