Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Date: 2011-10-26 14:49:17
Message-ID: m2sjmfu7te.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> I'm in favor of making that distinction.  I would still have pgsql_fdw,
> file_fdw, etc, be packaged more-or-less the same way and still use the
> CREATE EXTENTION framework, of course.

We called that idea “core extension” at the latest hackers meeting, and
Greg Smith had a patch with a first selections of extensions to package
this way.

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Chris RedekopDate: 2011-10-26 14:51:30
Subject: Re: Hot Backup with rsync fails at pg_clog if under load
Previous:From: Florian PflugDate: 2011-10-26 14:47:10
Subject: Re: Hot Backup with rsync fails at pg_clog if under load

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group