Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Finer Extension dependencies

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Finer Extension dependencies
Date: 2012-03-29 19:07:25
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> At the very least, I would suggest that feature names are per-extension.
> Yeah, I had about come to that conclusion too.  A global namespace for
> them would be a mistake given lack of central coordination.

That's how I did it first, but Alvaro opposed to that because it allows
for more than one extension to provide for the same feature name.

Dimitri Fontaine     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-03-29 19:13:52
Subject: Re: Finer Extension dependencies
Previous:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2012-03-29 19:00:03
Subject: Re: Finer Extension dependencies

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group