Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> At the very least, I would suggest that feature names are per-extension.
> Yeah, I had about come to that conclusion too. A global namespace for
> them would be a mistake given lack of central coordination.
That's how I did it first, but Alvaro opposed to that because it allows
for more than one extension to provide for the same feature name.
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-03-29 19:13:52|
|Subject: Re: Finer Extension dependencies |
|Previous:||From: David E. Wheeler||Date: 2012-03-29 19:00:03|
|Subject: Re: Finer Extension dependencies|