Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration

From: Gunnar Rønning <gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com>
To: <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration
Date: 2001-10-19 12:05:29
Message-ID: m2pu7jrg1i.fsf@smaug.polygnosis.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbcpgsql-patches
* "Dave Cramer" <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net> wrote:
|
| The one issue I have with a non ant based build system is that it makes
| it difficult to build the driver on a windows machine.

I think is a valid concern, since a lot of clients presumably will be running
on other architectures.  

Maybe a twofold solution ?

1. a very simple make file that doesn't care about dependencies and such.
2. ant as an alternative for developers and users of other
   platforms.

And I think more and more projects are migrating towards using Ant. Even
I have done so after 10 years of using make ;-)

-- 
Gunnar Rønning - gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com
Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Gunnar RønningDate: 2001-10-19 12:26:53
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration
Previous:From: Gerhard HäringDate: 2001-10-19 04:56:54
Subject: Re: Patch to fix memory leak in fetch in Python interface.

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Gunnar RønningDate: 2001-10-19 12:26:53
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration
Previous:From: Max LarssonDate: 2001-10-19 09:14:19
Subject: Retrieving Large object

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group