| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WAL "low watermark" during base backup |
| Date: | 2011-09-09 13:53:45 |
| Message-ID: | m2obytstxy.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> writes:
> Couldn't we send all available WAL after each single data-file instead
> of waiting for all data files to be transferred before sending WAL?
+1 (or maybe not at the file boundary but rather driven by archive
command with some internal hooking, as the backend needs some new
provisions here anyway).
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-09-09 14:05:08 | Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf |
| Previous Message | Florian Pflug | 2011-09-09 12:40:21 | Re: WAL "low watermark" during base backup |