Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration

From: Gunnar Rønning <gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>, Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration
Date: 2001-10-19 12:26:53
Message-ID: m2hesvrf1u.fsf@smaug.polygnosis.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbcpgsql-patches
* Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
|
| I think I can safely at to TODO:
| 
|     JDBC
|         o Move from Ant to Make builds

I don't think there is consesus over at the JDBC list yet. We need to get
all the pros/cons for both solutions on the table first. Make is not 
neccesarily better than Ant, I would think a combination would work best. 
Because then Mac and Windows users could use Ant to compile their JDBC
driver, while the compilation of the server on Unices would work
seamlessly.

-- 
Gunnar Rønning - gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com
Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-10-19 14:59:06
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration
Previous:From: Gunnar RønningDate: 2001-10-19 12:05:29
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-10-19 14:59:06
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration
Previous:From: Gunnar RønningDate: 2001-10-19 12:05:29
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group