On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> (Personally I wish some SOC student would do LATERAL. It would be useful and
> is a feature of about the right size, I think).
Actually, I think that requires two rounds of significant executor
refactoring. This is round two:
Round one, which Tom said he was already planning to do for 9.1, is to
eliminate the hack by which "outer tuples" are passed down into
nest-loops-with-inner-indexscan. Once those two things are done the
remaining work might be suitable for a GSoC project.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2010-04-09 21:02:32|
|Subject: Re: Gsoc XQuery|
|Previous:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2010-04-09 20:53:58|
|Subject: Re: GSoC - proposal - Materialized Views in PostgreSQL|