Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> writes:
> well you keep saying that but to be honest I cannot really even see a
> usecase for me - what is "only a random one of a set of servers is sync at
> any time and I don't really know which one".
It looks easy enough to get to know which one it is. Surely the primary
knows and could update something visible through a system view for
users? This as been asked for before and I was thinking there was a
consensus on this.
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2011-01-01 16:35:59|
|Subject: Re: Sync Rep Design|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-01-01 16:06:57|
|Subject: ALTER TABLE .. SET SCHEMA lock strength|