| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Triggers with DO functionality |
| Date: | 2012-02-17 21:56:19 |
| Message-ID: | m2d39di0os.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Has anybody stopped to look at the SQL standard for this? In-line
> trigger definitions are actually what they intend, IIRC.
In which language? Do we need to include PL/PSM to be compliant, and
use that by default? In that case we might want to force people to
spell out LANGUAGE plpgsql when we don't provide for PSM yet, so that we
avoid some backwards compatibility problems down the road.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-02-17 22:03:36 | Re: Triggers with DO functionality |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-02-17 21:46:30 | Re: Triggers with DO functionality |