Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration

From: Gunnar Rønning <gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com>
To: <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration
Date: 2001-10-21 03:24:33
Message-ID: m2bsj1n09a.fsf@smaug.polygnosis.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbcpgsql-patches
* "Dave Cramer" <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net> wrote:
|
| 
| There seems to be enough interested parties to support both build tools.
| For the folks that want a Makefile, they can support it. If someone
| wants to support the build.xml file, then we should encourage it. I
| suspect that one of them will become obsolete on it's own. 

I think that would be the best as well for time being. Don't remove ant 
support as that is very useful for the people working on the JDBC code, and
add standard make files for building the system. Make itself is not designed
to work with a language like Java, so you need third party tools to handle 
dependencies. 

        Gunnar



-- 
Gunnar Rønning - gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com
Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Rene PijlmanDate: 2001-10-21 12:06:21
Subject: Re: Does PG's JDBC support prepared statements at all?
Previous:From: Thomas O'DowdDate: 2001-10-21 02:37:29
Subject: Re: Does PG's JDBC support prepared statements at all?

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Rene PijlmanDate: 2001-10-21 12:04:31
Subject: Re: PreparedStatement parameters question
Previous:From: Thomas O'DowdDate: 2001-10-21 02:37:29
Subject: Re: Does PG's JDBC support prepared statements at all?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group