Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Teaching pg_receivexlog to follow timeline switches

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Phil Sorber <phil(at)omniti(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Teaching pg_receivexlog to follow timeline switches
Date: 2013-01-22 13:02:53
Message-ID: m28v7ll69u.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Phil Sorber <phil(at)omniti(dot)com> writes:
> What do you think about the idea of a full WAL proxy? Probably not for
> 9.3 at this point though.

I was thinking that a WAL proxy nowadays is called a cascading standby
with local archiving enabled. I'm not sure why you would want to trust
your archiving and WAL relaying to another piece of software…

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2013-01-22 13:10:17
Subject: Re: Teaching pg_receivexlog to follow timeline switches
Previous:From: Thom BrownDate: 2013-01-22 12:56:02
Subject: Re: Event Triggers: adding information

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group