Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration

From: Gunnar Rønning <gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com>
To: Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com>
Cc: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>, "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration
Date: 2001-10-20 02:23:59
Message-ID: m27ktr6ocg.fsf@smaug.polygnosis.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
* Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com> wrote:
|
| > Specifically, if we can include the ANT libraries in our CVS then my 
| > objection to ANT (requiring users to trackdown and download ANT) goes 
| > away, and I would then suggest we continue to use ANT for the other 
| > reasons you mention.
| 
| Works for me. As I mentioned in my last email, I'm easy about this one.  As
| long as I can build it in Linux/UNIX, I'm happy.  Its an added benefit to
| the postgresql community that it can be built on Windows and Mac.  

If we can include ant binaries that would be the best I agree. The Apache 
license shouldn't cause any trouble here, but mayve the size would ? What 
is the minimum required size of the Ant binaries anyway ?

cheers, 

        Gunnar

-- 
Gunnar Rønning - gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com
Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/

In response to

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-10-20 09:28:01
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration
Previous:From: Gunnar RønningDate: 2001-10-20 02:20:53
Subject: Re: FW: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group