* Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com> wrote:
| > Specifically, if we can include the ANT libraries in our CVS then my
| > objection to ANT (requiring users to trackdown and download ANT) goes
| > away, and I would then suggest we continue to use ANT for the other
| > reasons you mention.
| Works for me. As I mentioned in my last email, I'm easy about this one. As
| long as I can build it in Linux/UNIX, I'm happy. Its an added benefit to
| the postgresql community that it can be built on Windows and Mac.
If we can include ant binaries that would be the best I agree. The Apache
license shouldn't cause any trouble here, but mayve the size would ? What
is the minimum required size of the Ant binaries anyway ?
Gunnar Rønning - gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com
Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2001-10-20 09:28:01|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration|
|Previous:||From: Gunnar Rønning||Date: 2001-10-20 02:20:53|
|Subject: Re: FW: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration|