Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> FWIW, I agree with Thom on this. If we do it as you suggest, I
> confidently predict that it will be less than a year before we seriously
> regret it. Given all the discussion around this, it's borderline insane
> to believe that the set of parameters to be passed to command triggers
> is nailed down and won't need to change in the future.
I agree with the analysis…
> As for special coding of support, it hardly seems onerous when every
> language that has triggers at all has got some provision for the
> existing trigger parameters. A bit of copying and pasting should get
> the job done.
But had been (too easily) convinced not to take that route. You changed
my mind already, I'll see about changing the code too tomorrow (a cold
is having me out of steam for tonight).
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Greg Smith||Date: 2012-02-27 21:41:43|
|Subject: Re: pgstat documentation tables|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-02-27 20:53:58|
|Subject: Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 |