Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Command Triggers, patch v11

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Command Triggers, patch v11
Date: 2012-02-27 21:22:03
Message-ID: m24nucvuo4.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> FWIW, I agree with Thom on this.  If we do it as you suggest, I
> confidently predict that it will be less than a year before we seriously
> regret it.  Given all the discussion around this, it's borderline insane
> to believe that the set of parameters to be passed to command triggers
> is nailed down and won't need to change in the future.

I agree with the analysis…

> As for special coding of support, it hardly seems onerous when every
> language that has triggers at all has got some provision for the
> existing trigger parameters.  A bit of copying and pasting should get
> the job done.

But had been (too easily) convinced not to take that route.  You changed
my mind already, I'll see about changing the code too tomorrow (a cold
is having me out of steam for tonight).

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Greg SmithDate: 2012-02-27 21:41:43
Subject: Re: pgstat documentation tables
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-02-27 20:53:58
Subject: Re: Command Triggers, patch v11

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group