Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_retainxlog for inclusion in 9.3?

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_retainxlog for inclusion in 9.3?
Date: 2013-01-04 21:55:34
Message-ID: m238ygpq95.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Mostly that it seems like a hack, and I suspect we may come up with a
> better way to do this in the future.

Do you have the specs of such better way? Would it be a problem to have
both pg_retainxlog and the new way?

-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2013-01-04 22:11:18
Subject: Re: dynamic SQL - possible performance regression in 9.2
Previous:From: Dimitri FontaineDate: 2013-01-04 21:49:52
Subject: Re: Event Triggers: adding information

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group