Re: [INTERFACES] best postgres interface

From: "D'Arcy" "J(dot)M(dot)" Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>
To: tempest(at)wolfen(dot)com (j(dot) eidsness)
Cc: eric(at)broken(dot)net, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] best postgres interface
Date: 1999-03-25 11:57:48
Message-ID: m10Q8lg-0000c3C@druid.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

Thus spake j. eidsness
> = I see there are a couple of perl interfaces to
> = postgres. Does anyone have any comments as to the
> = best? I would prefer to use perl but if people
> = think is this the wrong way to go i would like
> = to know.
>
> I cannot tell you what the 'best' interface is, but i can tell you
> that *I* use perl (mostly cause i dunno C or C++) and it works fine. It's
> very flexible and returns tuples in a very managable manner. So far i have
> no reason to knock it, other than the fact that you application is already
> writeen in some other language (or you jus hate perl :)

I don't like Perl myself. I used to use Tcl which has an interface in the
tree as well but since I discovered Python I'm using that almost exclusively.
The interface to it is also in the tree or information can be found at
http://www.druid.net/pygresql/.

--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brett W. McCoy 1999-03-25 12:18:03 Re: [INTERFACES] PgAdmin
Previous Message j. eidsness 1999-03-25 09:33:22 Re: [INTERFACES] best postgres interface