Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] backslash in psql output

From: darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain)
To: maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian)
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane), hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] backslash in psql output
Date: 1998-10-11 04:40:24
Message-ID: m0zSDIu-0000emC@druid.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Thus spake Bruce Momjian
> OK, let's keep the removal of backslashes.  Can you recommend a nice
> NULL display, perhaps '[NULL]' or '<NULL>'?

I'd like to make at least one vote to keep the status quo.  Some of
us have come to depend on the existing behaviour.  At least make
it an option that you have to turn on.

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net>   |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: TaralDate: 1998-10-11 04:51:58
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] postmaster locking issues.
Previous:From: Billy G. AllieDate: 1998-10-11 03:16:01
Subject: PostgreSQL 6.4 patches - portability related.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group