| From: | darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain) |
|---|---|
| To: | vadim(at)krs(dot)ru (Vadim Mikheev) |
| Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: unfortunately... |
| Date: | 1998-09-25 17:07:59 |
| Message-ID: | m0zMbLb-00006FC@druid.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thus spake Vadim Mikheev
> I decided to do not implement FOREIGN keys in 6.4 -:((
Does this mean that we also won't have full primary key support? It
seems to me like it could be implemented without worrying about foreign
keys but you know better. I can work around it given the support
already there but it would be nice if making a field primary would
automatically set the relevant indisprimary field right now.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 1998-09-25 17:52:29 | Re: [HACKERS] SQL Triggers |
| Previous Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 1998-09-25 17:01:26 | Re: [HACKERS] SQL Triggers |